|
|
Back to Nursery Crops Development Center
Soilless Substrate
Management For Nursery Crops
by Dava
Hayden
It is an essential
management practice to test and document each load of substrate prior to
planting. Each load received from your
supplier may vary and will need to be tested.
Some substrate suppliers manage
their product closely to ensure consistency from shipment to shipment. Other suppliers simply provide a product that
allows their customers to adjust the substrate to meet their specific needs. Testing substrate prior to planting will allow
amendments to be properly incorporated in to the mix for greater plant
benefit. Failure to test each delivery of
substrate may lead to plant toxicities or deficiencies if pH substrate problems
are detected later in production. Worse
yet, expense to correct the problem or the loss of growth can costs far more
than a preventative approach to substrate management.
http://www.hort.cornell.edu/department/faculty/good/growon/media/organic.html
Bark is often used as a media component to increase the air porosity
within a mix. Some bark fragments contain up to 43% internal porosity, from
which roots can absorb water if penetration of the particle occurs (Pokorny, 1987). Pine bark, which is acidic in nature,
also has a low initial fertility-- an important characteristic of growing
media. Composted bark has a higher cation exchange capacity than raw bark and
represses pathogenic fungi (Hoitink, 1980).
Several bark particle sizes have
been recommended for media composition. Suggested formulations for
container-grown crops include:
· a mix characterized by 25-33% of the pine bark particles less than 0.5mm
in size;
· peat moss based media containing 25-50% pine bark; or
· media containing various bark particle
sizes attained by using a hammermill with a screen
size of 2 - 2.5 cm.
The use of bark in container media offers both advantages and
disadvantages. Bark which has not been composted properly induces nitrogen
deficiency problems; however, composted bark with sufficient nitrogen
fertilizer added during the process should not pose this problem. Bark from
alder, poplar, maple, and oak are prone to decay as a result of a high cellulose content; plants grown in media containing
these barks may experience nitrogen deficiency as the constituents rapidly
decompose. Because of this, it is necessary to add more supplemental nitrogen
to hardwood rather than softwood bark before or during composting to preclude
nitrogen deficiency (Bilderback 1982). Hardwood bark breaks down three times
more quickly than softwood bark. Continued decomposition of composted hardwood
bark media during the growing season increases the water-holding capacity and
decreases the air porosity of the mix. In addition, hardwood bark seems to
repress nematodes and root pathogens more effectively than softwood bark;
fungicidal inhibitors and antagonistic organisms present in composted hardwood
bark contribute to this repression. Some barks contain organic or inorganic
toxins, including high levels of monoterpenes,
phenols, or manganese that may prove harmful to plants. Phenolic
compounds in fresh barks are especially toxic to young nursery crops. Tree
species, age, time of harvest, soil type, and geographical region are factors
that affect phytotoxicity. Bark derived from older
trees, lower portions of the tree, or removed during winter months tends to be
more phytotoxic than bark removed from younger trees,
upper portions of the tree, or during spring months. In addition, obtaining
bark of uniform quality and particle size is often difficult.
The characteristics of softwood and
hardwood bark are quite different. Some softwood bark can be used without
composting; hardwood bark must be composted before use or phytotoxicity
may ensue. Aging and composting bark is usually an effective way to eradicate
toxins. Fresh pine bark repels water to a greater extent than aged pine bark or
composted hardwood bark; to increase the moisture content of pine bark, soak it
under a sprinkler system. Although pine bark has a lower water-holding capacity
than peat moss, it holds a greater amount of available water for the plant (Pokorny 1979). Avoid water stress in newly planted nursery
crops by watering regularly, particularly during the 30 days after planting.
Many plant materials appear to grow
well in fresh pine bark (Self and Pounders 1974).
Fresh pine or softwood bark usually has an initial pH range of 4.0 - 5.0; as
pine bark ages, the pH does not increase appreciably. To increase the pH of
pine bark, add 4 - 15 lbs. of dolomitic limestone per
cubic yard; within a few weeks the pH of the media should equilibrate to a
suitable planting pH (Bilderback 1982). Aged pine
bark is often favored over fresh pine bark by growers; this may be attributed
to a more desirable particle size distribution in the former (Pokorny, 1975).
Recently harvested hardwood bark is
usually characterized by a pH of 5.2 - 5.5. Lime should not be added to
hardwood bark mixes; as the bark ages or is composted,
the pH may exceed 7.0 as a result of the natural calcium content of the bark.
To avoid magnesium deficiency in hardwood bark mixes, incorporate one pound of
magnesium sulfate into each cubic yard of mix. If a bark-sand mix is desired,
add a low pH sand to decrease the pH of composted hardwood bark media (Bilderback, 1982).
As a general guideline, most woody
ornamentals crops produced in soilless mix, desire a pH of 5.5
to 6.2 for optimum plant growth. This
generality is not true for all woody ornamental nursery crops,
some prefer higher or lower pH. Solubility of mineral nutrients are affected by substrate pH. Iron, manganes,
boron, copper, and zinc are most soluble when pH is above 5.0 and below
5.5. On the contrary, as pH increases
greater than 6.5, the
availability of iron, manganese, boron, copper, and zinc decrease and
micronutrient deficiencies symptoms begin to appear. Chlorosis
is an indication that the pH is too high.
When testing substrate pH, you
should actually be testing your substrate solution, or
the water within your substrate. Use the
water source from which your plants will be irrigated to determine your
substrate solution. If you receive soilless substrate that does not meet your needs, then soil
amendments should be added.
If your pH is too low applications of either dolomitic limestone or
a liquid basic fertilizer (one that contains nitrate) should be made. Below is an exert
from, the July 2004 edition of Digger
Magazine. “Changing Container
Substrate pH -What are the affects of peat moss, lime source and lime rate?”, by James Altland. The article in its entirety can be viewed
from the following link: http://www.oan.org/publications/articles/july04-2a.html.
Influence of lime rate: With no lime added, Douglas fir bark
(with or without peat moss) has an initial
pH of 4.2. In our experiments, 5 pounds of pulverized lime raised substrate pH
to 6.4, and 10
pounds raised pH over 7. One might assume that doubling the rate of lime
would raise pH twice as high. Keep in mind that pH is measured on a logarithmic
scale, meaning for each unit increase in pH, H+ concentration
decreases 10-fold. Conversely, a unit decrease in pH means the H+
concentration increases 10-fold. Adding 5 pounds of lime resulted in an
increase of 2.2 units of pH, which translates to about a 158-fold (102.2)
decrease in H+ concentration. Adding 10 pounds of lime caused pH to rise just 0.7 units higher than adding 5 pounds. That's
still a 794-fold (102.9) increase in H+ concentration over
containers receiving no lime.
If your pH is higher than 6.4, elemental
sulfur or a liquid acidic
fertilizer (one containing NH4) can be used to reduce the pH of
your substrate. Often, when using a pine bark substrate, high pH is not a
problem unless too much lime was added or if you mix contains hard wood
decomposition. For further information
on reducing pH, link to http://hcs.osu.edu/basicgreen/
More information will be included at a later date. Additional information will include;
§
Over-coming delayed nitrogen mineralization, or
high N:C, from fresh bark substrates
§
Wetting agents to control moisture loss
Questions/Comments · Copyright ©
An Equal Opportunity University,
University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture
Last Updated: