University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Agriculture Image
the magazine
winter / spring 2003
past issues
search
text only
A Plant Pathologist Takes on Tall Fescue’s Endophyte

by Randy Weckman

Don't ask plant pathologist Chris Schardl about tall fescue grass unless you've brought your lunch along — and maybe dinner, too. Schardl is a world-renowned expert on tall fescue and its symbiotic friend, an endophyte fungus that lives inside the plant between the plant cells.

H

is research focuses on the relationship between the fungus and the grass. The plant nurtures and gives sustenance to the fungus and, in return, the endophyte helps the plant keep insects at bay, survive drought, and tolerate grazing by livestock. Schardl plans to tinker ever so slightly with the cozy relationship between the two to make the tall fescue-endophyte system better for livestock.

Tall fescue is a popular forage grass, with millions upon millions of acres of it growing from Wisconsin to Florida and from the East Coast to Kansas and beyond. Because nearly all of these millions of acres of fescue are infected with a fungal endophyte (which is a word made up from Greek, meaning within the plant), the grass has tremendous advantages over other common grazing grasses. But it also holds a significant disadvantage for livestock. The endophyte, with the scientific name of Neotyphodium coenophialum, can be responsible for poor weight gain, hormonal imbalances that lead to reduced fertility and lactation, birthing problems, and in extreme conditions, gangrene of the animals' limbs. Overall, it is estimated that tall fescue toxicosis may cost the livestock industry roughly $1 billion annually.

"In the tit-for-tat relationship between the two, the endophyte helps in a variety of ways, including drought tolerance, shoot growth, tillering, seed production, seed germination, phosphorus uptake, and resistance to nematodes and insects alike," Schardl said.

The symbiotic relationship is many thousands of years old. In fact, Schardl's group discovered that N. coenophialum shares a relationship with other Neotyphodium species (also called Epichloe species) in fescues and ryegrasses that are all over Europe and northern Africa, but the tall fescue endophyte has a uniquely complex origin as a hybrid of three other endophytes.

As a hybrid, the tall fescue endophyte brings together many beneficial traits that ancestral endophytes evolved as symbionts of ancient grass species. But like mules, which are the hybrid product of horses and burros, the tall fescue endophyte cannot reproduce sexually. Reproduction of the endophyte depends on its ability to extend microscopic runners into each developing seed of the tall fescue plant. When that seed germinates, the endophyte proliferates throughout the new plant's tissues.



Keeping the Good, Removing the Bad
Schardl's research, funded by both the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation, is a two-pronged project to:

  • Determine exactly how the fungus in fescue helps the plant.
  • Manipulate the genetics of the fungus to keep the good qualities while removing its ability to cause fescue toxicosis.

The plant pathologist believes that much has been accomplished toward these aims. Schardl's group, along with other researchers at UK and elsewhere, has shown how the endophyte starts the process that leads to toxicosis in grazing animals. The fungus produces three types of alkaloids. Of these, ergot alkaloid in the form of ergovaline is the most likely culprit in toxicosis in grazing animals.

The fungus also produces loline alkaloid and peramine alkaloid, both of which help protect the fescue plant from insects and drought. (Loline alkaloid is a natural insecticide. Peramine is rather nasty tasting to insects, which helps the plant ward off invasion from hungry insects.) Schardl also wants to see if loline alkaloid helps tall fescue survive drought. Apparently neither loline alkaloid nor peramine alkaloid is poisonous to grazing animals.

Schardl also has identified specific genes that control the production of the three types of alkaloids. Each is triggered by a different set of genes.

How did he do that?

Schardl's laboratory brings to bear the most current techniques in biochemistry and molecular biology and the classical techniques of Gregor Mendel and Thomas Hunt Morgan to find the alkaloid production genes. For example, in a "reverse genetics" approach, the researchers find out what chemical reactions are responsible for each step in the complex pathway the endophyte uses to manufacture each alkaloid. Then they find and analyze the biochemical catalysts (enzymes) for each of those steps. Finally, they use knowledge of the enzyme structure to find the genes that code for them. (Genes are really sequences of DNA that come together in a particular linear order to control the development of every cell in any living thing.)

A parallel approach uses principles of evolution, earning for Schardl a worldwide reputation as an expert in the evolution of symbionts. Schardl started his work in the evolution of symbionts by studying the origins of Neotyphodium species that are symbiotic with wild grasses, which are related to tall fescue. In doing so, he has discovered scores of new Neotyphodium species, some of which produce the same alkaloids as the tall fescue endophyte and some that don't.

By comparing the DNA sequences from different Neotyphodium species in what amounts to a sophisticated process of elimination, his group confirmed the identity of genes responsible for the production of ergovaline, the alkaloid that is toxic to animals. This same approach helped them find other genes that apparently direct the endophyte to make loline and peramine alkaloids, which help protect the plant from insects and drought.

The Next Step
Now that they've found the genes they were looking for, Schardl's group plans to insert foreign DNA (the building blocks of genes) in the middle of the gene that controls the production of ergovaline. It is hoped the result will be that the gene will not be able to express itself because of interferences from foreign DNA. This would stop the endophyte from producing the ergovaline toxin. Genes that control the other two alkaloids—the ones that help protect the plant from insects and drought—would be unaffected.

Schardl speaks about his work with confidence but without arrogance, as if what he's already done is merely applying known techniques to the problem described by other scientists. He is equally confident that he will be able to disengage the specific gene in the endophyte that causes fescue toxicosis while keeping the protective qualities of the endophytic fungus intact.

Already, graduate students in his laboratory have disengaged this gene in an endophyte of ryegrass (a first cousin to fescue) and have shown that the modified endophyte was still a capable symbiont.

Having put all the techniques in place and found the key genes, Schardl's laboratory is now engineering out the ergot alkaloid gene in the tall fescue endophyte. But why was time spent on a ryegrass endophyte, if plans really were to apply the techniques to tall fescue?

The answer is that the tall fescue endophyte, being a complex hybrid—sort of like a mule—requires more than double the time and effort needed to accomplish this task.

"It was necessary to show the U.S. Department of Agriculture that we knew how to do this so they would fund our work on tall fescue, which will cost more time and money than ryegrass," Schardl said.

The ryegrass system is being used to determine specifically the costs, benefits, and risks of this kind of engineered product. Meanwhile, Schardl's students are developing and testing more sophisticated approaches to modify the tall fescue endophyte.

"Our new approach is intended to remove the gene we want to remove yet have no foreign gene in its place," Schardl said. "Although this may sound simple—and maybe someday it will be—it actually requires us to make some additional technological advances in fungal molecular biology," Schardl said.

"The payback could be enormous. If we can eliminate the endophyte's ability to manufacture ergovaline, we may greatly improve the economics of pasturing livestock in Kentucky and much of the eastern U.S.," he said.

The Stowaway Grass and Fescue War

T

all fescue grows throughout the South as the premier grazing grass. The most common cultivar — which became known later as Kentucky 31 — was discovered in Menifee County, Kentucky, by University of Kentucky agronomist E.N. Fergus in the fall of 1931, a year noted for a severe drought. Fergus, in Frenchburg that day judging a local sorghum syrup contest, heard from the clerk of the circuit court about an amazing grass growing locally. Intrigued, Fergus asked to see the grass growing on W.M. Suiter's farm. Fergus later admitted that he didn't recognize the species. To his astonishment, the grass was lush, green, and quite vigorous. Fergus noted that on that hillside where the grass was growing there was virtually no erosion. He asked for seed, which he brought back to Lexington. The grass performed well in research trials and was officially named Kentucky 31. Because of these characteristics, Kentucky 31 was planted throughout the South and Midwest to provide grazing pasture and control erosion on millions of acres.

Kentucky 31 was so aggressive and hardy that it took over large regions wherever it was planted. But soon, farmers noticed that livestock grazing it sometimes didn't perform well, especially in hot weather, and they raised questions about it. As a result, Kentucky 31 became quite controversial within the College of Agriculture's agronomy department, especially between two professors. One professor continued to preach the blessings of the grass, while the other cursed it. Fergus reported many years after his retirement that he was able to stay out of the fray, but opined that avoiding the conflict was difficult. Sometimes referred to as the Fescue War, the duel over Kentucky 31, which was quite acrimonious and public, continued from the late 1940s until the summer of 1952, when both antagonists left the University of Kentucky. Subsequent to that, other University of Kentucky agronomists continued to investigate the concerns with Kentucky 31 fescue and helped establish the mechanism by which fescue toxicosis is effected.

The fact that the grass found on W.M. Suiter's hillside in 1931 is not a native grass, but rather of European origins, is puzzling. The story explaining how this European grass became established in Menifee County is fascinating but well may be apocryphal. The legend is that a shipment of bone chinaware from England arrived in Menifee County sometime in the 19th century. Grass packing material surrounded the fine china to help prevent breakage during the long ship ride across the Atlantic. That stowaway grass was tall fescue, and its own stowaway was the fungal endophyte. The seed in the packing grass, perhaps planted on purpose or by accident, became the progenitor of today's fescue, now growing on millions of acres throughout the South. And despite tall fescue toxicosis, the growth, persistence, drought tolerance, and suitability on hillsides continue to make it a very popular grass.

top