Online Publications

PDF file available

PR-461

2001 Alfalfa Grazing Tolerance Variety Report

R.F. Spitaleri, J.C. Henning, G.D. Lacefield, and C.T. Dougherty

Introduction

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is historically the highest yielding, highest quality forage legume grown in Kentucky. It forms the basis of Kentucky's cash hay enterprise and is an important component in dairy, horse, beef, and sheep diets. Recent emphasis on its use as a grazing crop and the release of varieties reported to be tolerant of heavy and even continuous grazing have raised the following question: Do varieties differ in tolerance to overgrazing?

This report summarizes current research on the grazing tolerance of alfalfa varieties when subjected to continuous, heavy grazing pressure during the grazing season. Although some yield data are presented, the focus is on plant stand survival.

Description of the Tests

Alfalfa variety tests for grazing tolerance were established in Lexington in the fall of 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000. The soils at this location are well-drained silt loams and are well suited to alfalfa. Plots were 5 x 15 feet in a randomized complete block design with each variety replicated six times. In each test, 20 pounds of seed per acre were planted into a prepared seedbed using a disk drill. All seed lots were treated with metalaxyl and inoculated if not supplied with these treatments. Grazing was continuous from April until October. Supplemental hay was fed during periods of slowest growth. Visual ratings of percent stand were made in the fall and spring after each grazing season. Pests (weeds and insects) were controlled so they would not limit yield or persistence. Fertilizers (lime, P, K, and Boron) were applied as needed. Included in each trial were Alfagraze as the grazing-tolerant check variety and Apollo as the grazing-susceptible check variety.

Results and Discussion

Weather data for Lexington are presented in Table 1. In 2001, temperature and precipitation were close to normal.

Data on percent stand are presented in Tables 2 through 5. Statistical analyses were performed on all alfalfa yield data (including experimentals) to determine if the apparent differences are truly due to variety or just due to chance. Varieties not significantly different from the highest numerical value in a column are marked with one asterisk (*). To determine if two varieties are truly different, compare the difference between the two varieties to the Least Significant Difference (LSD) at the bottom of the column. If the difference is equal to or greater than the LSD, the varieties are truly different when grown under the conditions at a given location. The Coefficient of Variation (CV), which is a measure of the variability of the data, is included for each column of means. Low variability is desirable, and increased variability within a study results in higher CVs and larger LSDs.

Two years of grazing were sufficient to severely deplete the stands of Apollo and show differences among most commercial varieties (Tables 2, 3, 4). In the 2000 seeding, stands of Apollo were depleted (after one year of grazing). Apollo is the grazing-susceptible check variety, and its depletion is an indication of heavy grazing pressure.

Table 6 summarizes information about distributors, fall dormancy, disease resistance, and persistence across years and locations for all varieties in these tests.

Summary

These studies indicate alfalfa varieties have been developed that express tolerance to overgrazing without going out of stand, compared to standard hay-type alfalfas. In addition, newer grazing-tolerant varieties have significantly improved yields over Alfagraze. It should be noted, however, that although these varieties were abused during the growing season, they were allowed to rest and regrow after September 15 to prepare for winter.

This information should be used along with yield and pest resistance information in selecting the best alfalfa variety for each individual use. It is not recommended that alfalfa be continuously grazed as was done in this trial. While several varieties expressed tolerance to the level of grazing pressure used in these trials, overgrazing greatly reduces yield and therefore profitability of these alfalfas.

Good management for maximum life from grazing alfalfa would include:

Mention or display of a trademark, proprietary product, or firm in text or figures does not constitute an endorsement and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other suitable products or firms.

Table 1. Temperature and rainfall at Lexington during the 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 growing seasons.
  1998 1999 2000 2001
Temp Rainfall Temp Rainfall Temp Rainfall Temp Rainfall
MON
°F
DEP
IN
DEP
°F
DEP
IN
DEP
°F
DEP
IN
DEP
°F
DEP
IN
DEP
JAN
41
+10
3.96
+1.10
36
+5
5.64
+2.78
32
+1
3.48
+0.62
31
0
0.9
-1.9
FEB
41
+6
2.54
-0.67
40
+5
2.32
-0.89
43
+8
4.97
+1.76
40
+5
3.2
0
MAR
46
+2
3.40
-1.00
40
-4
3.27
-1.13
48
+4
3.47
-0.93
40
-4
2.7
-1.7
APR
54
-1
6.20
+2.32
56
+1
1.87
-2.01
53
-2
4.10
+0.22
59
+4
1.7
-2.2
MAY
67
+3
6.14
+1.67
65
+1
1.35
-3.12
67
+3
2.96
-1.51
66
+2
4.9
+0.4
JUN
73
+1
10.81
+7.15
74
+2
3.89
+0.23
73
+1
3.22
-0.44
71
-1
2.0
-1.6
JUL
75
-1
7.98
+2.98
80
+4
1.00
-4.00
74
-2
3.42
-1.58
75
-1
5.6
+0.6
AUG
76
+1
0.29
-3.64
75
0
1.31
-2.62
74
-2
3.38
-0.55
76
+1
4.8
+0.8
SEP
74
+6
0.61
-2.59
69
+1
1.03
-2.17
66
-2
5.47
+2.27
65
-3
3.0
-0.2
OCT
58
+1
2.41
-0.16
57
0
1.91
-0.66
59
+2
0.92
-1.65
56
-1
3.6
+1.1
NOV
47
+2
2.09
-1.28
51
+6
1.70
-1.69
43
-2
1.59
-1.80
51
+6
2.8
-0.6
AVG
59.3
+2.7
4.2
+0.5
58.5
+1.9
2.3
-1.4
57.5
+0.8
3.4
-0.8
57.3
+0.7
3.2
-0.5
DEP is departure from the long-term average for that location.

 

Table 2. Dry matter yields (tons/acre) and percent stand of alfalfa varieties sown September 2, 1997, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a grazing tolerance study.

Variety
% Stand
Nov 9, 1999
Mar 21, 2000
Oct 20, 2000
Apr 2, 2001
Commercial varieties -- available for farm use
Alfagraze 70.0* 73.3* 58.3* 49.2*
ABT 205 70.0* 73.3* 45.0 40.8*
ABT 405 70.0* 73.3* 36.3 34.2
Amerigraze 401+ Z 66.7 63.3 30.8 25.8
Wintergreen 58.3 66.7 18.3 28.3
Grazeking 58.3 61.7 14.2 20.0
Haygrazer 51.7 56.7 16.8 19.2
Apollo 51.7 53.3 9.2 15.8
Experimental varieties -- not available for farm use
ZG9632 80.0* 80.0* 54.2* 54.2*
ZG9633 73.3* 71.7* 48.3* 48.3*
ZG9631A 75.0* 80.0* 51.7* 46.7*
ZG9641 76.7* 80.0* 52.5* 44.2*
ZG9640 70.0* 70.0* 35.0 31.7
BARUSA 96-54 56.7 66.7 14.2 20.0
A9201 60.0 63.3 8.0 14.2
A9303 48.3 55.0 6.3 15.0
   
Mean 64.8 68.0 31.2 31.7
CV, % 9.3 13.4 35.7 36.7
LSD, 0.05 10.7 10.5 12.8 13.4
* Not significantly different from the highest numerical value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

 

Table 3. Percent stand of alfalfa varieties sown September 15, 1998, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a grazing tolerance trial.

Variety
Percent Stand
Nov 9, 1999 Nov 20, 2000 Apr 2, 2001
Commercial varieties -- available for farm use
Alfagraze 88.3* 4.5 32.0
WL 326 GZ 85.0* 18.3 28.3
Gold Plus 85.0* 5.8 26.3
Pro Gro 86.7* 5.2 25.5
Baralfa 54 88.3* 7.7 24.7
Spreador 3 83.3 22.5 24.2
Wintergreen 86.7* 22.5 23.3
Pioneer 98 88.3* 13.5 18.3
Amerigraze 401+ Z 86.7* 12.2 17.5
Apollo 90.0* 12.0 14.5
Experimental varieties -- not available for farm  
ZG9740 88.3* 65.0* 68.3*
ZG9741 90.0* 55.0* 61.7*
 
Mean 87.2 20.4 30.4
CV, % 5.06 48.16 52.9
LSD, 0.05 0.51 11.34 18.6
* Not significantly different from the highest numerical value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.


Table 4. Percent stand of alfalfa varieties sown March 27, 2000, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a grazing tolerance trial.
  Percent Stand
Variety May 3, 2001 Oct 17, 2001
Commercial varieties -- available for farm use
Alfagraze 68.3 23.3*
Feast 67.5 19.7
115 Brand 75.0 13.3
Amerigraze 401+Z 52.5 5.8
Apollo 43.3 4.3
Experimental varieties -- not available for farm use
ZG9834 65.0 33.3*
ZG9830 73.3 29.2*
GA-AG-MPX 71.7 27.0*
A9811 65.0 24.7*
ZG9840 59.2 16.7
 
Mean 64.1 19.7
CV, % 22.1 48.5
LSD, 0.05 16.5 11.1
* Not significantly different from the highest numerical value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.


Table 5. Percent stand of alfalfa varieties sown September 19, 2000, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a grazing tolerance trial.
  Percent Stand
Variety Apr 9, 2001 Oct 17, 2001
Commercial varieties -- available for farm use
Alfagraze 89.2 75.8*
115 Brand 90.0 65.0*
Feast 89.2 61.7
Amerigraze 401+Z 90.0 56.7
ABT405 89.2 54.2
ABT350 88.3 33.3
Haygrazer 88.3 31.7
Apollo 83.3 20.0
Experimental varieties -- not available for farm use
FOO-501 88.3 74.2*
ZG9840 90.0 70.0*
CW 54056 87.5 50.8
5M85 90.0 12.5
 
Mean 88.6 50.5
CV, % 2.99 19.5
LSD, 0.05 3.06 11.4
* Not significantly different from the highest numerical value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.


Table 6. Characterization and persistence of alfalfa varieties under heavy grazing pressure across years and locations.
  Variety Characteristics1 Lexington
FD 4 Disease Resistance2 19973 1998 1999 2000
Variety Proprietor/KY Distributor BW FW AN PRR APH Nov5 1999 Mar 2000 Nov 2000 Apr 2001 Nov 1999 Mar 2000 Nov 2000 Apr 2001 May 2001 Oct 2001 Apr 2001 Oct 2001
Commercial varieties -- available for farm use
115 Brand Monsanto Global Seed 3 HR HR R HR R                  *   * *
ABT205 several 2 HR HR HR HR R * *   *                 
ABT350 several                                 *  
ABT405 several 4 HR HR HR HR R * *                 *  
Alfagraze America's Alfalfa 2 MR R MR LR - * * * * * *     * * * *
Amerigraze401+Z ABI/America's Alfalfa 4 HR HR HR HR R         * *         *  
Apollo ABI/America's Alfalfa 4 R R LR R -         * *            
Baralfa54 Barenbrug 5 R HR HR HR -          * *            
Feast ABI/AgriPro 3 HR HR MR HR R                  *   *  
Gold Plus MBS Inc. 4 HR HR HR HR R          *              
Grazeking FFR/Southern States 5 MR HR HR R S                        
Haygrazer Great Plains Research 4 HR HR R R MR                     *  
ProGro MBS Inc. 4 HR HR R HR MR         * *            
Spredor 3 Novartis 1 HR HR R MR S                         
Wintergreen ABI Alfalfa 3 HR HR HR HR R         *              
WL326GZ W-L Research Inc. 4 HR HR HR HR HR          * *            
Experimental varieties -- not available for farm use
5M85 Forage Genetics Intn'l                                 *  
A9201 FFR Cooperative 4 HR HR HR HR R                        
A9303 FFR Cooperative 4 R HR R HR R                        
A9811 FFR Cooperative                             * *     
BARUSA96-54 Barenbrug   R HR HR HR HR                        
CW54056 Cal/West Seeds                                 *  
FOO-501 FFR Cooperative                                 * *
GA-AG-MPX University of Georgia 2 HR HR R R R                  * *     
I97PE98 Pioneer 2 - - HR MR MR          * *            
ZG9631A ABI Alfalfa 3 HR HR HR HR HR * * * *                 
ZG9632 ABI Alfalfa 3 HR HR HR HR HR * * * *                 
ZG9633 ABI Alfalfa 3 HR HR HR HR HR * * * *                
ZG9640 ABI Alfalfa 4 HR HR HR HR HR * *                  
ZG9641 ABI Alfalfa 3 HR HR HR HR HR * * * *                 
ZG9740 ABI Alfalfa 4 HR HR HR HR HR          * * * *         
ZG9741 ABI Alfalfa 4 HR HR HR HR HR          * * * *         
ZG9830 ABI Alfalfa 3 HR HR HR HR HR                  * *     
ZG9834 ABI Alfalfa 2 HR HR HR HR HR                  * *     
ZG9840 ABI Alfalfa 4 HR HR HR HR HR                  *   * *
1 Variety Characteristics: FD=Fall Dormancy BW=Bacterial Wilt FW=Fusarium Wilt AN=Anthracnose PRR=Phytophthora Root Rot APH=Aphanomyces Root Rot.
2 Disease Resistance: S=Susceptible LR=Low Resistance MR=Moderate Resistance R=Resistance HR=High Resistance.
3 Establishment Year.
4 Fall Dormancy: 2=Vernal 3=Ranger 4=Saranac 5= DuPuits.
5 Date of measurement of percent stand.
Shaded boxes indicate that the variety was not in the test.
Open boxes indicate the variety was in the test, but its persistence was significantly less than the top-ranked variety in the test.
* Not significantly different from the top-ranked variety in the test.

 


Equal opportunity statement